In the last few years, there has been an increased attack on the institutions of Social Security and Medicare. Stories have surfaced pointing out that the Senate Republicans have their eyes on working to cut these valuable programs. As of November of 2018, stories have surfaced from the Trump administration about plans to ramp up the attacks on Medicare and on Social Security.
In times such as these, the advocacy work being done by Max Richtman and the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare is more important than ever before. Here’s everything you need to know about the NCPSSM.
The National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare is an organization that advocates for the protection of the Medicare and Social Security programs in the United States. The group is working to accomplish its goals by utilizing tactics such as endorsements and campaign contributions to candidates who support protecting these programs, as well as grassroots movements, direct mailings, and advertising related to this issue.
Founded In 1982 to preserve sacred institutions of the US, the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare is working to solve the solvency issue with Social Security. The NCPSSM hopes to accomplish its goals by advocating for tax increases that can help to deal with this issue, and stands in opposition of plans to privatize the Social Security system. A lifting of the payroll tax cap in terms of Social Security is one of the major goals that the NCPSSM continues to maintain.
The organization also puts its support behind the concept of adding prescription drug benefits to the current Medicare program and also backs healthcare reforms, including the Affordable Care Act.
The National Committee was initially founded back in 1982 by James Roosevelt who formerly served in Congress as well as being the son of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Its current Chief Executive Officer and President are former Senate Special Committee Staff Director Max Richtman.
The NCPSSM is one of the most dedicated and legitimate grassroots advocacy groups currently operating in the political sphere of the US. The organization has been fighting to preserve these sacred American institutions for well over three decades now and has been led by some of the most qualified individuals in the world of advocacy, such as Max Richtman.
Endorsing candidates that lend support to the issues that are important to the NCPSSM is one of the organizations major activities. Political candidates that have been endorsed recently include Congressional candidates such as Peter Joffrion of Alabama and Alyse Galvin of Alaska. From the ranks of the Senate, individuals such as Senator Dianne Feinstein of California and Senatorial candidate Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona are endorsed by the group. These candidates and many others are endorsed by the NCPSSM through its Political Action Committee.
It is important to stress the fact that all donations to the National Committee are classified as tax-deductible, according to their official site. This is to the fullest extent of the law. So, if you’re looking for a good cause, that will benefit you down the road, shelling out a couple dollars towards this worthy cause will help you save on taxes this year.
The National Committee To Preserve Social Security And Medicare has achieved a number of notable accomplishments over its distinguished history. Some of the most notable recent accolades include,\ successfully lobbying to get the Older Americans Act Reauthorization Act of 2015 through the Congressional process. In 2017, the organization was successfully able to push back against Trumpcare, and 2018 saw the organization successfully lobby to restore critical funding toward the Social Security Administration.
Though the organization has been praised for its diligent and committed work over the years, thee have been a handful of criticisms. Among these was the criticism of the advocacy group's initial fundraiser. During this promotion, donors were offered copies of the Social Security record for the contribution in the amount of $10. The criticism of this action was the fact that these records were already available through the Social Security Administration free of charge.
There was also an incident in 1987 where the organization was criticized for using tactics that caused seniors to fear they would lose their Social Security benefits.
